Michigan Courts Site Search 
 
  MICHIGAN COURTS  
  MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT

No. 118181

People of the State of Michigan,  
Timothy A. Baughman (313) 224-5792
Plaintiff-Appellee,
   
vs (Appeal from Ct of Appeals)    
    (Recorder's Ct -- S. Cox)  
Douglas W. Baker (313) 256-9833
Marcel R. Riddle,    
Defendant-Appellant.
   

Click to view briefs in Adobe format:

Plaintiff-Appellee's Brief on Appeal>>

Defendant-Appellant's Brief on Appeal>>

Background
Defendant Marcel Riddle and two friends, Robin Carter and James Billingsley, were socializing on the evening of August 15, 1997. Riddle was grilling fish just inside the detached garage next to his home. According to Riddle, he tried to break up an argument between Carter and Billingsley, only to be threatened by Carter with what Riddle thought was a gun. Riddle, who was standing inside the door of his garage, grabbed his rifle, which he kept in the garage, and shot at the ground in front of Carter, allegedly intending to frighten Carter. Billingsley gave a different version of events, testifying that Riddle went into his house and returned with the rifle after a verbal exchange with Carter. Carter sustained a total of eleven gunshot wounds to his legs, and died from those wounds. The Wayne County Prosecutor charged Riddle with first-degree murder and felony-firearm. At trial, Wayne County Circuit Judge Sean Cox instructed the jury that defendant had a duty to retreat from Carter if he could safely do so. The jury convicted defendant of the lesser offense of second-degree murder, plus felony-firearm. Riddle was sentenced to 15 to 30 years for second-degree murder, and a consecutive two-year term for felony-firearm. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in an unpublished decision. Riddle appeals. He argues that the trial judge should have instructed the jury that Riddle had no duty to retreat from Carter because Riddle was in the "curtilage," or area surrounding his home. Riddle's argument rests on a line of Michigan Supreme Court decisions from the 1800s. The prosecution argues that the "no duty to retreat" doctrine applies only when the person being attacked is in his or her own home, not in the area outside the home.

 

 

Get the latest version of Internet Explorer. Some of the files on this site are PDF files. To view PDF files, you need Acrobat Reader. Download your free copy here.

Technical questions about this site should be sent to webinfo@courts.mi.gov.
Questions about the content on this site should be sent to msc-info@courts.mi.gov.