Navigate Up
Sign In

​Human Resources Management

The relationship of the chief judge with other judges on a multi-judge bench and with court staff is based on the provisions of Michigan Court Rule 8.110: Chief Judge Rule.  MCR 8.110(C)(3) imparts to the chief judge accountability for the hours of work, attendance, productivity, and vacations of his or her fellow judges. The chief judge is responsible and has the authority to determine the hours of the court and the judges, to coordinate the number of judges required to be present at any one time to perform necessary judicial and administrative work of the court, and to require their presence to perform that work; and to coordinate judicial vacations and absences, subject to the provision of Michigan Court Rule 8.110(D).
A judge may not be absent from the court without the chief judge's prior approval, except for personal illness. In making the decision on a request to approve vacation or other absences, the chief judge may consider, among other factors, the pending caseload of the judge involved, including the judge's latest report pursuant to MCR 8.107, the number of cases ready for trial and awaiting trial, and the length of time the cases have been pending. The chief judge is required to maintain records of absences to be available at the request of the Supreme Court.  MCR 8.110(D)(6).
MCR 8.110(C)(3)(d) provides that it is the responsibility of the chief judge to supervise the performance of all court personnel, with authority to hire, discipline, or discharge such personnel, with the exception of a judge's secretary and law clerk, if any.

For details on determining qualifications of court staff, ethics, absences from the court, staffing problems, and use of contractors from Section 5 of the Michigan Court Administration Reference Guide.


Guidance on Personnel Administration in Trial Courts

Guidance in personnel and labor relations matters may be gained through the management responsibilities listed in MCR 8.110: Chief Judge Rule, duties imposed by various state and federal laws, and case law. For details on some of the more relevant laws, see Section 5-03 of the Michigan Court Administration Reference Guide.
Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order 1998-5 addresses several matters related to personnel administration and a court’s relationship with its funding unit. Excerpts from the administrative order are published in Section 5-04 of the Michigan Court Administration Reference Guide or see the full text of the Administrative Order 1998-5.
Michigan case law has established trial courts as the employer of record as it relates to court employees. Examples of Michigan cases include but are not limited to the following:  Judges of the 74th Judicial Dist v Bay Co, 385 Mich 710 (1971); Seventeenth Dist Probate Court v Gladwin  v Gladwin Co Bd of Commrs, 155 Mich App 433 (1986); Ottawa Co Controller v Ottawa Probate Judge, 156 Mich App 594 (1986); and Judicial Attorneys Assn v State of Michigan, 459 Mich 291 (1998).  For additional information, see Section 6-07 of the Michigan Court Administration Reference Guide.

Required Local Administrative Orders 

Court Holidays

The court is directed to observe a specific list of holidays, except those courts which have adopted modifying local administrative orders. Furthermore, courts are required to promulgate a modifying administrative order, if appropriate, to accommodate or achieve uniformity with the holiday practices of local governmental units regarding local public employees. A judge may continue a trial in progress, however, or dispose of judicial matters on any of these specifically listed holidays if he or she finds it to be necessary. MCR 8.110(D)(2).

Delegation of Authority to Court Staff

If the chief judge delegates certain judicial acts to others, it must be done through local administrative order. 


Authority for Probate Register to Perform Judicial Acts

Under Michigan statute (MCL 600.834) and court rule (MCR 8.301), a chief probate judge may, through issuance of an order, grant to a probate register the authority to perform certain judicial acts.  Model provided.

District court Magistrate

This local administrative order is required by Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order 2009-6, effective January 1, 2010. The district judge may appoint a magistrate to serve at the pleasure of the judge(s) to exercise the jurisdiction and duties only as authorized by the chief judge, presiding judge, or only judge of the district court. MCL 600.8501, MCL 600.8503.  Models provided.
Update attorney/non-attorney magistrate contact information - Fillable PDF

Domestic Relations Referee 

This local administrative order is required by Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order 2009-6, effective January 1, 2010. The chief circuit judge may designate a referee to exercise the duties set forth in MCL 552.507(1) and MCR 3.215(A).  Model provided.

Juvenile referee

This local administrative order is required by Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order 2009-6, effective January 1, 2010. The chief circuit judge may designate an attorney referee or a non-attorney referee to exercise the duties set forth in MCL 712A.10 and MCR 3.913.  Models are provided.
Update attorney/non-attorney referee contact information - Fillable PDF

Emergency Services Plan

If a court is notified by its funding unit of a reduction of the original appropriation for the court for the current fiscal year, the court shall immediately file a copy of that notice with the State Court Administrative Office in accordance with Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order 1994-6. The court, among other things, must provide an emergency services plan which outlines what services are essential.

staff contact


Michigan supreme court human resources

Jodi Latuszek

Peggy Ruiz-Helmic
ADA Coordinator

Troy Evans